We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy on the information contained on this site, or the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a lot of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for just a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
If the DIGP finds evidence of a cognizable offense by possibly party, he shall direct the relevant SHO to record statements and commence according to the legislation. This petition stands disposed of in the above mentioned terms. Read more
Persuasive Authority – Prior court rulings that could be consulted in deciding a current case. It could be used to guide the court, but is just not binding precedent.
184 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the moment case, the guidelines as set forth would not implement, because the criminal Court hasn't convicted the petitioner, somewhat he has actually been acquitted of the criminal charges based on evidence and it is nicely-settled law that once the civil servant is acquitted inside the criminal case, then on this pretty charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment with the department and held him disqualified for your post because acquittal for all long term purposes. The aforesaid proposition is established at naught via the Supreme Court of Pakistan from the case on the District Police Officer Mainwali and 2 others v.
Although there isn't any prohibition against referring to case regulation from a state other than the state in which the case is being heard, it holds very little sway. Still, if there isn't any precedent in the home state, relevant case law from another state could possibly be considered with the court.
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in support from the Supreme Court, guaranteeing the enforcement of its judgments. As being the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been attained, the decision on the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of your Constitution. Read more
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is usually a free and democratic state, and once a person becomes a major they can marry whosoever he/she likes; When the parents with the boy or Woman never approve of these inter-caste or interreligious marriage the maximum they could do if they can Slice off social relations with the son or the daughter, Nonetheless they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes this sort of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Female who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person who is a major, the few is neither harassed by any one nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anyone who provides these types of threats or harasses or commits acts of violence either himself or at his instigation, is taken to undertaking by instituting criminal proceedings by the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against these person(s) as provided by law.
10. Without touching the merits in the case of your issue of annual increases while in the pensionary emoluments with the petitioner, in terms of policy decision from the provincial government, these types of annual increase, if permissible within the case of employees of more info KMC, needs further assessment to generally be made through the court of plenary jurisdiction. KMC's reluctance as a result of funding issues and insufficient adoption of provincial increases, creates a factual dispute that cannot be resolved in writ jurisdiction, requiring the petitioner to go after other legal avenues. Read more
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle founded by a court, which other courts are obligated to observe.
Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The regulation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair for the offender as well as the Magistracy is to be certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts Nonetheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The lots of this power casts an obligation on the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability from the matter, but couldn't be answerable in almost any way for their actions. When the court delayed making such a ruling, the defendants took their request on the appellate court.
Because of their position between the two main systems of law, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as combined systems of regulation.
States also ordinarily have courts that deal with only a specific subset of legal matters, for example family regulation and probate. Case regulation, also known as precedent or common legislation, could be the body of prior judicial decisions that guide judges deciding issues before them. Depending on the relationship between the deciding court and the precedent, case regulation might be binding or merely persuasive. For example, a decision through the U.S. Court of Appeals to the Fifth Circuit is binding on all federal district courts within the Fifth Circuit, but a court sitting down in California (whether a federal or state court) will not be strictly bound to Adhere to the Fifth Circuit’s prior decision. Similarly, a decision by a single district court in Ny is just not binding on another district court, but the initial court’s reasoning could help guide the second court in achieving its decision. Decisions with the U.S. Supreme Court are binding on all federal and state courts. Read more